THE KUSHNER FAMILY PASSOVER HAGGADAH

THE KUSHNER FAMILY PASSOVER HAGGADAH

INTRODUCTION

Welcome to our Passover Seder! The history of the Jewish people reaches back nearly 4,000 years. We began as slaves in the land of Egypt but today we are free. As we recline in the luxury of freedom in our new Kalorama mansion, let us not forget our white Christian brothers and sisters yearning for release from bondage. We remember the baker forced to bake for every wedding and the ovum oppressed by its mother’s womb. May this Seder inspire us to light the torch of liberty and burn anyone who stands in our way. Thus we begin with the lighting of the candles.

KIDDUSH BLESSING OVER THE WINE

Next, we recite the blessing over the wine, given to us from Eric Trump Winery, the largest winery on the East Coast. This wine symbolizes the sweetness of a wealthy father and the joy we feel when we are all together, with the exception of Melania who prefers to stay in New York. Amen.

PARSLEY

The parsley on our Seder plate reminds us of spring and the earth’s natural bounty, which does not need cumbersome government regulations. We dip the parsley into salt water representing the bitterness of liberal tears. Then eat.

MATZAH

This is the bread of affliction. It is the simple bread our ancestors ate in the land of Egypt, Brooklyn, and New Jersey before reaching the Promised Land of Washington D.C. Our ancestors overcame great suffering in their journey to freedom without any government assistance. To those who are hungry and in need, we offer our prayers and hope, which is enough — Dayenu!

THE FOUR QUESTIONS

We’re not answering any questions today. No questions.

THE FOUR CHILDREN

The Torah instructs us to teach our children the story of Passover. The sages tell us there are four types of children:
The Wise Child — He understands what’s going on but is unable to convince others.
The Wicked Child — He understands what’s going on but goes along with it because it enriches him.
The Simple Child — He hasn’t a clue what’s going on but stupidly trusts Steve Bannon will figure it out.
The Child Unable to Ask — This kid is so shell-shocked by what’s happening that he turns mute like in the movie Tommy.

MIRIAM’S CUP

A cup of water is placed on the table to honor the prophet Miriam. Legend says God sustained the Jews as they wandered the desert with a steady stream of water coming out of Miriam’s wherever. We embrace this new Passover tradition as passionate advocates for the empowerment of women as symbolized by our “Make Women Great Again” luxury candle, available for sale at ivankatrump.com. This candle combines notes of peony, sandalwood, and conflicts of interest.

THE PASSOVER STORY

Now it is time to retell the story of Passover: A Pharaoh came to power in Egypt who feared the Jews because they wore strange head coverings. He didn’t believe the Jews were loyal to Egypt and loyalty was extremely important to Pharaoh, more than spelling, honesty, or the Constitution.

Pharaoh enslaved the Jews and forced them to make bricks for his tacky buildings with his name written on them in giant hieroglyphs. Then he issued a “Pharaoh-Order” mandating every Jewish male newborn was a security risk and must be drowned in the Nile, Pharaoh’s way of keeping “bad dudes” out of Egypt.

One Jewish mother resisted. She placed her baby in a tiny boat made of ancient Planned Parenthood signs, remnants of a bygone era, and set him afloat in the Nile, hoping he’d be saved. An undercover CIA operative posing as Pharaoh’s daughter found the baby, named him Moses, and raised him as her own.
Eventually, Moses learned of his true family’s identity and tried to help the Jews. (Family must always remain loyal—through felony convictions, product boycotts or impeachment.) Moses started @RoguePALACEfamily to spread hope, but failed to get Pharaoh to pivot on the Jewish labor issue. That’s when God had to step in and visited ten terrible plagues upon 

Egypt. They were:

• Gender Neutral Bathrooms
• Tuition-Free Public College
• Paid Family Leave
• Sensible Gun Control
• $15.00 Federal Minimum Wage
• Internet Privacy
• Carbon Tax
• Dodd-Frank
• Campaign Finance Reform
• Universal Health Care

Egyptians suffered greatly during these plagues. Everyone was getting the same opportunities. Pharaoh couldn’t handle it. After each plague, Pharaoh agreed to let the Jews go. But once the plague disappeared he’d tweet:

“FAKE NEWS got it wrong again — Jews know they r better off w/me than Moses. LOSER!!”

Curiously the tweets always happened on Shabbat. But amid great sorrow over the final plague of universal health care, Pharaoh relented. The Jews fled quickly into the desert without allowing their dough to rise and were stuck with a dry, tasteless, constipation-invoking bread substitute instead — the first matzah.

EXPLANATION OF PASSOVER SYMBOLS
SHANK BONE
The shank bone represents the sacrificial lamb Jews slaughtered the night they left Egypt. This Passover we engrave the shank bone with “Elizabeth Warren 2020.”

BITTER HERBS

These herbs remind us of the unfathomable bitterness of white working class America who threw a Hail Mary into our system of government in a last-ditch effort to bring back jobs in coal, steel, and VCR repair.

CHAROSET

A yummy salad of apple, nuts and cinnamon which shows off Ivanka’s cooking skills and her relatable desire to be a sweet and caring mother to her children. #familytime

ROASTED EGG

This egg is a symbol of rebirth and new opportunities for revenge on those who have betrayed us.

WELCOMING ELIJAH

We set aside a special cup of wine for the prophet Elijah. Legend says Elijah will return to earth to lead the way for peace. Unfortunately, we are unable to open our door to welcome Elijah as tradition dictates due to the protesting crowds outside.

CONCLUSION

As we conclude our Seder we give thanks to the Lord, our God, and ask for his greatest blessing of peace but take nothing off the table.

This year we are here; next year in Moscow!

Settler colonialism of Palestine . Who was here first?

The entrance of Caliph Umar (581-644) into Jerusalem, 19th century colored engraving, via Wikipedia

 The concept of “settler colonialism” has been applied with almost unique vehemence against Israel. But the fact that Jews are the indigenous population of the Southern Levant can be proved with ease. In contrast, historical and genealogical evidence shows Palestinians descend primarily from three primary groups: Muslim invaders, Arab immigrants, and local converts to Islam. The Muslim conquest of Byzantine Palestine in the 7th century CE is a textbook example of settler-colonialism, as is subsequent immigration, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries under the Ottoman and British Empires. The application of the concept to Jews and Zionism by Palestinians is both ironic and unhelpful.

One of the mainstays of the modern university is the idea of settler-colonialism. This argues that certain societies are birthed by settlers implanted in a foreign territory, either directly by or with the consent of an imperial power. These colonists then dominate and eradicate the indigenous population. They develop bellicose cultures that eliminate the natives from historical, literary, and other narratives. Primary examples often cited are the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, South Africa and Rhodesia, and Israel.

The settler-colonial argument against Israel posits that Zionism was an imperial tool of Britain (or, alternatively, that Zionism manipulated the British Empire); that Jews represent an alien population implanted into Palestine to usurp the land and displace the people; and that Israel has subjected Palestinians to “genocide,” real, figurative, and cultural.

According to this argument, Israel’s “settler colonialism” is a “structure, not an event,” and is accompanied by a “legacy of foundational violence” that extends back to the First Zionist Congress in 1897 or even before. With Zionism thus imbued with two forms of ineradicable original sin, violent opposition to Israel is legitimized and any forms of compromise, even negotiation, are “misguided and disingenuous because ‘dialogue’ does not tackle the asymmetrical status quo.”

But Middle Eastern history is not amenable to these formulations. Among the many concepts abused and perverted by the Palestinians, accusations of Israeli “genocide” rank the highest for blatant audacity, and for twinned calumny and odiousness. The settler-colonial idea deserves attention for three reasons: its comparatively recent adoption by Palestinians and their advocates; its broader currency in the academy; and its obvious and ironic falsity.

The idea of Jews as “settler-colonialists” is easily disproved. A wealth of evidence demonstrates that Jews are the indigenous population of the Southern Levant; historical and now genetic documentation places Jews there over 2,000 years ago, and there is indisputable evidence of continual residence of Jews in the region. Data showing the cultural and genetic continuity of local and global Jewish communities is equally ample. The evidence was so copious and so incontrovertible, even to historians of antiquity and writers of religious texts, some of whom were Judeophobes, that disconnecting Jews from the Southern Levant was simply not conceived of. Jews are the indigenous population.

As for imperial support, the Zionist movement began during the Ottoman Empire, which was at best diffident towards Jews and uncomfortable with the idea of Jewish sovereignty. For its part, the British Empire initially offered support in the form of the Balfour Declaration, but during its Mandatory rule (1920-48) support for Zionism vacillated. The construction of infrastructure aided the Yishuv immensely, but political support for Jewish immigration and development, as stipulated by the League of Nations mandate, waxed and waned until, as is well known, it was withdrawn on the eve of World War II. This is hardly “settler-colonialism.”

Ironically, the same cannot be said for the Palestinian Arabs. A recent analysis by Pinhas Inbari reviewed the history of Palestine (derived from the Roman term Palaestina, applied in 135 CE as a punishment to a Jewish revolt). Most notably, he examines the origin traditions of Palestinian tribes, which continue even today to see themselves as immigrants from other countries. Inbari’s review, along with many additional sources of information he did not address, demonstrates that modern Palestinians are, in fact, derived from two primary streams: converts from indigenous pre-modern Jews and Christians who submitted to Islam, and Arab tribes originating across the Middle East who migrated to the Southern Levant between late antiquity and the 1940s. The best documented episodes were the Islamic conquests of the 7th century and its aftermath, and the periods of the late Ottoman Empire and the British Mandate.

Even notable examples like Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, who ludicrously claimed that “I am the proud son of the Canaanites who were there 5,500 years before Joshua bin Nun burned down the town of Jericho,” traces his real family lineage to the Huwaitat tribe, which migrated from Arabia to Jordan. The rare admission by Hamas minister Fathi Ḥammad that “half the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis” is more honest.

Echoing Inbari, it is not to be argued here that “there are no Palestinians” who thus do not deserve political rights, including self-rule and a state. To do so would be both logically and morally wrong. Palestinians have the right to define themselves as they see fit, and they must be negotiated with in good faith by Israelis. What Palestinians cannot claim, however, is that they are Palestine’s indigenous population and the Jews are settler-colonialists.

Palestinian genealogies that show their own tribes originating outside the Southern Levant are prima facie evidence of Arab settler-colonialism. And while narratives of the Arab conquests of Byzantine Palestine and North Africa cannot be taken at face value, they are pure ideological expressions of settler-colonialism. In 634-37 CE, Muslim armies commanded by the Caliph Umar conquered the entirety of the Levant before invading Armenia and Anatolia in 638 and Cyprus in 639.

The subsequent Islamization and Arabization of the Levant was a long and complex imperial process that entailed reorganizing the region into administrative provinces, instituting new social categories for the purposes of taxation and control, implanting settlers and reapportioning lands as estates, and encouraging conversion to Islam. Over the centuries, other settlers migrated and were intentionally implanted, including, in the 19th century alone, Egyptians fleeing from and imported by Muhammad Ali from the late 1820s to the 1840s, as well as Chechens, Circassians, and Turkmen relocated by the Ottoman Empire in the 1860s after its wars with Russia. Tribes of Bedouins, Algerians, Yemenis, and many others also immigrated during that century.

As for modern immigration, Inbari could well have pointed to the well-documented increases in Palestinian census numbers from 1922 to 1931, produced by illegal immigration spurred by the development of the region’s infrastructure and economy. One estimate sees some 37% of the increase in Palestinian population between 1922 and 1931, over 60,000 persons, having been the result of illegal immigration. Another study found that from 1932 to 1946, another 60,000 illegal male immigrants entered the country, with uncounted females imported as brides. These were in addition to the great influx of Arab workers from 1940 to 1945 in connection with the war effort.

To reiterate, these arguments do not devolve to arguing “a land without a people for a people without a land,” or that Ottoman Palestine was “empty” when the Zionist movement began. It was indeed populated, albeit unevenly, but those populations had immigrated into the land over the previous centuries, a process that accelerated precisely because of the Zionist movement and the British Mandate. Palestinian settler-colonialism took place, ironically, under the aegis of both a Muslim and a Christian empire.

Finally, there is the matter of a separate Palestinian ethno-national consciousness and its relationship to settler-colonialism. Claims to find a separate Palestinian ethnic identity as far back as the 17th century are unpersuasive. Instead, the idea developed as an elite concept in the years immediately before and especially after World War I, vying with far deeper and more resilient tribal and religious identities. The nationalization of the masses occurred gradually over the next few decades, propelled in part by tragedies largely foisted on them by their leaders, notably the “Arab Revolt” of 1936-39, the rejection of partition in 1947, the Israeli War of Independence of 1948-49, and the subsequent, rather local, dispersal of refugees into the 1950s. Palestinian nationalism and identity are largely reactive and secondary, pointing to the fact that settler-colonial identity was primarily tribal and religious, the latter imperial by definition.

During the 19th and 20th centuries, a mythology of the “timeless” Palestinians took root. During the earlier period, this was a European Orientalist trope: the Palestinians as living “fossils” who reflected the lifeways of the Bible. It was later adopted for strategic reasons by the Palestinians themselves as a political and cultural retort to the Zionist return to the land. That usage was perhaps understandable, if ironic; but it reaches a reductio ad absurdum in Erekat’s claim to have had Upper Paleolithic ancestors.

It is, then, the Palestinians who are the settler-colonialists, not the Jews or even the Zionists. Does this realization change anything? Does removing a term from the rejectionist toolbox bring the cause of negotiation and peace any closer? This seems unlikely. But in the longer term, facing certain truths will be necessary for Palestinians and Israelis alike. One is that rejection of Israel, at its core, is not a function of Palestinian nationalism and local identity but Islamic religious opposition to Jewish autonomy and sovereignty. Another is that tendentious categories like “settler-colonialism,” which ironically undermine Palestinian claims to indigenous status, should be dispensed with in favor of honest appraisals of history.

Walls, Fences and Barriers. Israel versus other Countries Security Measures

This is a repost of an article I wrote last May 2014 and ask Why is Israel Separated for Security?.

Very recently I wrote an update on this entitled ‘The Great Wall of Saudi Arabia’  and now have added the Hungary/Serbia border barrier  and Hungary/Croatia.

The Saudis are adding to an existing wall some 965 klms with not a peep from anyone??.

Strange you say? Yes, but then it isn’t Israel.

http://jewsdownunder.com/2015/01/17/great-wall-saudi-arabia/

I bet there will not be a peep once again from the likes of the ‘enemy within’, the rabid Palestinian supporters of the media.

Funny isn’t it how Israel is the only country singled out in her efforts to protect her citizens for being murdered?

—————————–

I have been trying to write this for years and to be honest with you, I have enough material to write a book. If only I had the time, it’s taken long enough to get this far.

I started researching a few years back with the view to showing how the ‘Separation Barrier’ built by Israel is just that, and not an “Apartheid Wall”, or one of the many names given to it. The more I researched the more information kept coming.

Walls are built to provide some sort of protection and  have been built almost since the dawn of Man, be it walled cities, walled compounds or walls to protect an entire country.

We build walls or fences around our homes to keep undesirables out, to keep our children and animals in and out of harms way.

However now reading back through what I have written, I see walls, barriers, fences call them what you will, some of which are thousands of kilometres long and which are designed to keep criminals, illegal entrants, terrorists and would be conquerors out, a good idea.

So why in G-d’s name is Israel singled out for being the bad one when all she is trying to do is to protect Her citizens?

You have to see it as nothing else except antisemitism.
Everywhere I looked there was an oversupply of information on Israel’s barrier which is in place for protection, whilst precious little elsewhere on other walls.

===============================

A defensive wall (or a “Rampart”) is a fortification used to protect a city or settlement from potential aggressors. In ancient to modern times, they were used to enclose settlements.

Let’s try to fathom out why Israel is the only country whose barrier is called an “Apartheid wall” and why, when there are so many in existence, is Israel’s the only one to cause such a furor?

Security fences have been built around the world for thousands of years, often in disputed territories, with the purpose of protection, disrupting the movement of terrorists, smugglers, and illegal immigrants.

While security fences/barriers are common throughout the world, Israel’s decision in 2003 to construct one was met with protests by the international community and a hearing at the International Court of Justice. No other security barrier has ever been met with such resistance.

I started collecting information about modern barriers but then my mind wandered back into the past.

The walled city of Jericho is amongst the oldest and famed  walls built for protection that we are aware of.

Jericho in Judaea and Samaria, had a wall surrounding it as early as the 8th century BCE. Jericho is described in the Torah, as the “City of Palm Trees” and is famed as the place of the decisive Battle of Jericho. The story goes that the walls of Jericho fell after Joshua’s army marched around the city blowing their trumpets.

“Shout! For the Lord has already given you the town… So they shouted as loud as they could. Suddenly, the walls of Jericho collapsed.” -Joshua 6:16,20

Uruk in ancient Sumer (Mesopotamia) is one of the world’s oldest known walled cities. Another well-known ones are in Babylon, built by King Nebuchadnezzar, also Cartagena.

During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the shore of Hong Kong’s Guangdong province suffered from pirate attacks. Its winding shores, hilly lands, islands and being far from administrative centres made Hong Kong an excellent hideout for pirates. So the villages built walls to protect themselves against them.

In medieval Britain, walled villages were built. The entire population of the village lived within the walls, complete with their animals, they were completely self-contained with heavy doors which closed at night for protection.

A famous walled city in England is the beautiful  and picturesque city of York, the beauty unfortunately is marred by its bad history regarding its Jewish population.

In 1190 York’s Jews had a holocaust of their own. A wave of antisemitic riots culminated in the massacre of an estimated 150 Jews – the entire Jewish community of York.

A plaque commemorates that event today. You hear things like that and then realise why we do need to protect ourselves.

credit:Heritage Explorer

No doubt the wall best known to all is the Great Wall of China, built over a period of many years to keep out invaders. The Romans built Hadrian’s Wall in the north of England, on the border with Scotland, to keep out the barbaric Scots.

So clearly walls for protection and/or to prevent ‘comings and goings’ are not a new phenomenon.

This is a list of 12 Impressive Walled Cities in the World you might like to look at.

12 Impressive Walled Cities in the World

12 Impressive Walled Cities in the World

12 Impressive Walled Cities in the World

The Berlin Wall:

One of the most well-known ‘modern’ walls of the world no doubt was the Berlin wall. After the defeat of Germany in WW2, the country was divided amongst the allies, Britain, the US and the USSR as occupation forces. A militarised barrier some 160 kilometres (100 miles) long that entirely separated the enclave of West Berlin from the rest of the city and from East Germany as a whole, the Wall was built in 1961 and torn down in 1989.

Rio de Janeiro:

In 2009, Rio de Janeiro started  building walls around some of its ‘favelas’, the shanty towns that crowd the hills around the city.

In total, 13 favelas will eventually be surrounded by concrete with a total length of 14km (8.6 miles) and a height varying between 80cm (32 inches) and 3m.

The aim is to prevent the precariously-constructed communities spilling over into the forest and destroying the surrounding vegetation of the Tijuca Park, one of the largest urban nature reservations in the world.

Some critics think Rio’s walls are an attempt to separate the poor areas from the richer ones situated between the favelas and the sea.

Others say they are intended to limit drug trafficking, as part of a planned regional government clamp down.

Western Sahara:

The wall was was built to defend Western Sahara from the Polisario Front – a political and military movement which seeks independence from Morocco and autonomy for the Sahrawi people.

The wall, was completed in 1987 is in reality a collection of six different defence walls.

Its total span is more than 2,700km (1,677 miles), and is made up of a mixture of sand and stone, barbed wire, ditches and mine fields.

Human rights organisations refer to it as the “wall of shame” and condemn the use of anti-personnel landmines along its length.

North/South Korea:

This is the most heavily militarised border in the world and was constructed between North and South Korea in 1953. Bristling with razor wire, sensors, landmines and heavy weapons, the Demilitarized Zone stretches for 250 kilometres (155 miles) along the full length of the border.’

China/North Korea:

China is now reinforcing fences along its border with North Korea as fears mount of a catastrophic famine in the secretive state.

Fences more than 13ft high, topped with barbed wire, where previously there was a 10ft high fence in place, are now being erected along an eight-mile stretch of the Yalu river around the Chinese city of Dandong.

Malaysia-Thailand

United States/Mexico:

The border between Mexico and the United States is 3,200km (1,988 miles) long.

The US government has built a metal wall along a third of it, at an estimated cost so far of $2.5bn (£1.5bn), to prevent the arrival of illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America.

The first barriers actually began to appear in 1991, but in 1994 the US officially decided to step up their surveillance and expanded the wall under Operation Guardian.

According to the Mexican National Commission of Human Rights, more than 5,600 illegal immigrants have died trying to cross the border in the subsequent years.

The majority died as a consequence of the high temperatures in the desert.

As well as the wall itself, there are also three metal fences in some places along the border, preventing any kind of contact at all. Its average height is 4-5m (13-16ft).

Construction of a “virtual wall” has also recently begun.

This comprises a series of technological devices such as infrared sensors, cameras, radar, watch towers and ground sensors.

13ft high hi-tech fence.

Thailand/Malaysia:

In 2001, the two countries jointly agreed to construct a fence along their 400 mile border to reduce smuggling and stop the infiltration of Malaysian Muslim extremist groups that led to the South Thailand Insurgency, a separatist campaign in Thailand’s three southernmost provinces.

It has just been approved to upgrade 141km of it to an electronic fence.

 Brunei/Malaysia:

In 2005, Brunei built a security fence along its 20-kilometer border with Limbang, Malaysia in order to control illegal immigration and smuggling.

Greece/Turkey:

After having made an agreement with Frontex on the guard of the maritime borders of Greece with Turkey the Greek government decided a 124-mile (200 kilometre) wall should  be built at the land border with Turkey, the Evros River.

These actions have been made as a reaction to the illegal immigration to Greece through the Greco-Turkish borders. These immigrants are originated from Muslim Asian and African states. From January to the beginning of November 2010, 32,500 illegal migrants were intercepted in a single 12.5-kilometer stretch of the Turkish-Greek border along the Evros river.

Actually this site is the main entrance of illegal immigrants to the EU from the Asian continent. Illegal immigration is a current subject between the two countries.

Cyprus:

A 300-kilometre (187-mile) UN-patrolled buffer zone has divided Greek and Turkish Cypriots since 1974. A wall built along part of the line in the centre of the capital Nicosia was dismantled in 2007. However, Nicosia remains the world’s only divided capital

Israel/Gaza Strip barrier:

In the Gaza–Jericho Agreement the Palestinian Authority agreed to allow Israel to build a “security fence” around Gaza. The Palestinians largely tore down the barrier between Gaza and Israel at the beginning of the Second Intifada in September 2000. Israel rebuilt it between December 2000 and June 2001 and added a one kilometre buffer zone

Egypt/Gaza

In 1979, after the signing of the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty, the two States created a 14 kilometre long, 100 metre wide strip of land, the Philadelphia Route, as a buffer zone between Israeli occupied Gaza and Egypt. It includes the Rafah Border Crossing between Egyptian and Palestinian controlled Rafah.

Israel built a stronger corrugated sheet metal and barbed-wire barrier as part of a larger 2 to 300 metre buffer in the Philadelphia corridor during the Palestinian uprisings of the early 2000s.

One purpose of the Philadelphia Route was to prevent the movement of illegal materials (including weapons and ammunition) and people between Egypt and the Gaza Strip. Now Palestinians, in cooperation with some Egyptians, have built smuggling tunnels under the Philadelphia Route to move these into the Gaza Strip.

Gaza/Egypt separation barrier.

Since this time Egypt has constructed a steel wall underground in order to prevent tunnel building and smuggling, but this hasn’t deterred the tunnel builders who dug deeper.

India/Pakistan:

The border between India and Pakistan is one of the most volatile on the planet.

Walls, barbed wire fences and barricades stretch almost half the 2,900km (1,800 mile) boundary line.

At the end of the 1980s, India began erecting barriers in the states of Punjab and Rajastan, saying they needed to combat terrorism.

An additional cause of tension is the use of barbed wire fences combined with mines and other high-tech devices along almost all of the so-called “Line of Control”, the de facto border between Indian- and Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

The fence is designed to keep terrorists from crossing the border from Pakistan to launch attacks in India. Made up of barbed wire, concertina wire, and giant 25-foot-tall floodlights, it swallows up acres of fertile farmland in Jammu.

Credit: BBC

India announced prior to construction:

“India will send a team to Israel to learn from its experiences in erecting the security barrier along the West Bank and Gaza Strip to assess technologies that New Delhi could implement at its fence with Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Home minister P Chidambaram, who had launched the fencing project in 1986, told a group of MPs this week that the government was exploring use of modern technology in border management and would send a team to Israel to assess technologies used there.”

India/Bangladesh ,India/Burma, India/Kashmir:  

 The India/Bangladeshi  fence is 4,000-kilometres long and the India/Burma one 1,624-kilometres.

Both are being built to check smuggling, illegal immigration and possible infiltration by Islamist terrorists. The refugee crisis could also ensue should a climate catastrophe ravage South Asia.

In addition, India completed the construction of the Indian Kashmir barrier which runs along the Line of Control in Kashmir. The purpose of this barrier is to prevent infiltration by armed militants. Many Kashmiris both in Jammu and Kashmir are against the border barrier since Kashmir is a disputed territory.

Credit: in.reuters.com

Malaysia-ThailandPakistan/Afghanistan:

The barrier is in place to curb the movement of pro-Taliban militants and members of Al Qaeda into Afghanistan along the 1,500-mile border.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai said that Pakistan was trying to “enslave the Afghans” with the fence. Opposition groups within Pakistan have said the fence would be “detrimental to the social and economic interests of the ethnic Pashtun tribes.”

Iran-Pakistan:

The border fence is constructed of large earth and stone embankments, ditches, guard fortresses (3 feet thick, 10 feet high) this is to stop smuggling of drugs to Iran and fuel to Pakistan and to stop terror attacks
The length is 435 miles.

Kyrgyzstan/Uzbekistan:

A land dispute led to the unilateral construction of a barbed wire fence by Uzbekistan to secure their border with Kyrgyzstan in 1999. The fence was constructed after Islamic terrorists from Kyrgyzstan were blamed for bomb attacks in the Uzbek capital of Tashkent.   

Botswana/Zimbabwe:

The government of Botswana claims to have started building a ten-foot-high electric fence along its border with Zimbabwe to control the spread of foot-and-mouth disease. However, most Zimbabweans believe that the fence — 300-mile (480 km) long — really aims to stanch the immigration flow from troubled Zimbabwe into calmer Botswana.

Melilla and Ceuta:

Ceruta/Morroco and Melilla/Morocco : Border fences built by Spain with EU funding between Morocco and the Spanish city’s of Ceruta and Melilla on the north Moroccan coast to stop illegal immigration and smuggling.

The fences are 6 miles of 3 parallel 10 feet fences with barbed wire. Ninety miles of underground cable connect spotlights, noise and movement sensors, and video cameras to a central control booth.
They aim to stop the flow of illegal immigrants from Morocco.

United Arab Emirates/Oman: Oman & Yemen

All countries have 12 to 13ft wire electrified fences in an attempt to curb the flow of illegal migrants, illicit drugs and terrorists into the countries.

Iraq/Kuwait:

 The Kuwait–Iraq barrier is a 120-mile (190 km) border fence extending six miles (10 km) into Iraq, 3 miles (5 km) into Kuwait, and across the full length of their mutual border from Saudi Arabia to the Persian Gulf.

It was constructed by authorization of the United Nations Security Council, its stated purpose being to stop a re-invasion of Kuwait by Iraq.

The border barrier, made of electrified fencing and concertina wire, is braced by a 15-foot (4.6 m)-wide and 15-foot (4.6 m)-deep trench, complete with a 10-foot (3.0 m)-high dirt berm and guarded by hundreds of soldiers, several patrol boats, and helicopters. Construction of the barrier began in 1991.

In January 2004, Kuwait decided to install a new 217 km iron border barrier along the existing border. The stated needs were protecting the northern border, and preventing cars coming from Iraq from approaching the electricity bars.

The barrier cost an estimated 28 million dollars and  extends from Umm Qasr until the joint border triangle where Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait meet.

Saudi Arabia/Yemen:

This barrier was constructed by Saudi Arabia along part of its 1,800 kilometre border with Yemen. It is a structure made of pipeline three metres (10 ft) high, filled with concrete and supported on posts and fitted with electronic detection equipment.

The border fence cuts through mountains, deserts and sea borders will provide visibility and operational awareness to Saudi Border Guard by the use of cutting-edge technology which includes installation of sophisticated radar systems along the extensive border.

Designed to stop Al Qaeda attacks

Saudi Arabia/Iraq:

Saudi Arabia has  550-mile ( 885 kilometres)high-tech fence to seal off its troubled northern neighbour.

It is a  barrier equipped with ultraviolet night-vision cameras, buried sensor cables and thousands of miles of barbed wire, will snake across the vast and remote desert frontier between the countries.

This combined with the Yemen barrier is the longest in the world.

Saudi Arabia/UAE:

There is not too much to be found about this border fence except that the border is disputed and it seems that Saudi Arabia has staked its claim!

Hungary/Serbia

In July 2105, Hungarian government began building of border fence between the two countries is 175 kilometres (109 mi) long and  4 metres (13 ft) high began .

credit: Bőr Benedek

The fence, which features concertina wire, is being built by contractors and a deployment of 900 soldiers at a cost of 30 billion forints ($106 million) for the 4-metre (13-foot) fence and the construction of two camps to house asylum applicants.

The fence is to block the entry to Hungary of migrants unwilling to apply for refugee status in Hungary, thus deflecting the flow of illegal refugees.  Then Croatia led the migrants to its border with Hungary, Hungary then started the construction of a second fence along its border with Croatia on 18 September 2015.

The outer fence is made up of three rows of razor wire. Inside that, there is a sturdier barrier 3.5 metres (11.5 feet) tall and complete by 14 September.

Hungary/Croatia

On October 16th 2015 the border between Hungary and Croatia was closed when the country completed the construction of a razor-wire barrier along the 220-mile border with Croatia in an attempt to prevent illegal migrants entering the country.

credit: World Bulletin

Hungarian Foreign Minister said people would only be able to cross into the country through official border stations and submit asylum requests at two locations.

When Hungary  its  border with Serbia with a similar fence it left thousands of migrants stranded. They went through Croatia instead, where the government ferried them on buses and trains to the Hungarian border with Austria.

Now with the Croatia border sealed, it seems that migrants will be forced to look for alternate routes, perhaps through Romania, which has so far not been a major transit country for them.

Who knows? Maybe another wall which the leftists, the media and Israel haters will ignore.?

Israel

Don’t think this is the first time a protection barrier has been in place in Israel.

Tegart’s Wall was a barbed wire fence erected in May-June 1938 by the British authorities on the northern border to keep militants from Syria and Lebanon from infiltrating to join the 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine. It was described as an

“ingenious solution for handling terrorism in Palestine.”

Pillbox built along the route of Tegart’s Wall, still standing today near Goren industrial zone, Northern Israel

The separation barrier, was built on the orders of Charles Tegart, the adviser to the government on the suppression of terrorism.

The barrier was strung along the entire Palestine frontier. It included a nine-foot barbed wire fence between Palestine and French-mandated Lebanon and Syria on the north and northeast.Before the fence was completed,

“a band of Arab terrorists swooped down on a section of the fence…ripped it up and carted it across the frontier into Lebanon.”

Five Tegart forts and twenty pillboxes were built along the route of the fence. Even so, the infiltrators easily overcame the fence and evaded mobile patrols along the frontier road.

The barrier angered local inhabitants on both sides of the border because it bisected pastures and private property. After the rebellion was suppressed in 1939, the wall was dismantled.

Israel is forced to act:

From September 2000 to mid-2005, hundreds of Palestinian suicide bombings and terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians killed more than 1,000 innocent people and wounded thousands of others.

In response, the Israeli government seeing how effective the  security fence between Israel and the Gaza Strip had been at keeping out suicide bombers, decided to construct one that that would run near the “Green Line” between Israel and, Judaea and Samaria, aka the West Bank, to prevent Palestinian terrorists from easily infiltrating into Israel proper.

The project had the overwhelming support of the Israeli public and was deemed legal by Israel’s Supreme Court.

In 2003 the Israeli government started fencing off Judaea and Samaria.

The 500-mile anti-terrorist barrier has proved to be a huge success . A couple of years into building it showed that attacks had declined by as much as 90 % and the number of Israelis murdered and wounded had decreased dramatically.

Just 4% of the barrier is constructed of concrete, the rest is wire fencing.  Yet the Leftists highlight the concrete part which was put in situ due to sniper fire and in the main is around Bethlehem.

Given what you have just read regarding other walls in the world, why then this from the International Court of Justice?

UN News Centre – link here

Where is the outcry regarding these other walls, fences and barriers?

I think we know the answer to that.

OH, and by the way, there are a few more ‘separation barriers’ in the world.

Ironically, after condemning Israel’s barrier, the UN announced plans to build its own fence to improve security around its New York headquarters.

In conclusion the beautiful walls of the City of Jerusalem.